Why You Should Avoid the Term 'Differently Abled'

Why You Should Avoid the Term 'Differently Abled'

Using respectful and appropriate language when discussing disability is an important part of disability rights”here are some best practices for terminology and why you should avoid the term "differently abled."

 

Brief Overview of Disabilities

A disability is a condition”typically a mental, physical, or emotional limitation”that impairs a person's ability to do something specific, such as walk, communicate, or learn. ADHD, autism, brain injuries, cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, epilepsy, hearing impairment, mental illness or mental health conditions, and neurological disorders are examples of disabilities. Some medical professionals classify disabilities based on their type, such as physical disabilities (which affect a person's body), intellectual disabilities (which affect a person's thinking or learning), developmental disabilities (which occur during childhood or adolescence), congenital disabilities (which exist from birth), and invisible disabilities (which are not visible to others).

Ableism, or discrimination against people with disabilities, and accessibility, or the measure of access that people with and without disabilities have to institutions, support, and buildings and spaces (for example, "accessible parking").

 

Why œDifferently Abled Is Not Preferred Language

Some health care and disability activists coined the term "differently abled" to replace the term "disabled" in the 1990s. While well-meaning, this term is euphemistic and serves to avoid discussing a person's disability in honest and specific terms (critics point out that everyone is "differently abled" according to the dictionary definition). The term's popularity faded in the mid-2000s, and many people in the disability community now find it condescending or offensive.

 

Best Practices around Terminology for Disabilities

The use of appropriate language and terminology to be respectful to members of the disability community is a fundamental component of disability rights. Here are a few examples of best practices:

Avoid using outdated terms. The terms "differently abled" (and "the differently abled"), "handicapped", "special needs" or "special education", "wheelchair-bound" (as opposed to "is a wheelchair user"), and "cripple" are all outdated, ableist, and potentially offensive to members of the disability community. All of these terms have negative connotations, either because they are euphemisms or because they imply that people with disabilities have a lower quality of life than people without disabilities; avoid them and replace them with more appropriate terms.

Consider how you describe people who are not disabled. There are appropriate terms to use when describing people without disabilities, in addition to appropriate terms for people with disabilities. Use language like "people without disabilities," "nondisabled," or "enabled" instead of words like "normal," "able," "abled people," or "able-bodied," which suggest that those with disabilities are abnormal or do not have able bodies.

Find out whether you should use "people-first" or "identity-first" language. People with disabilities, like any other group, do not exist in a vacuum. When discussing people with disabilities, keep in mind that they are multifaceted human beings rather than a simple group. To reflect this, whenever possible, use person-first language”for example, "a person with epilepsy" rather than "an epileptic person," or "a person with blindness" rather than "a blind person"”to emphasize the individual and avoid allowing their disability to serve as their sole defining quality. Some communities, however, prefer identity-first language over people-first language; for example, many deaf people who use sign language prefer the term "deaf person" to "person who is hard of hearing," and many people with autism prefer the term "autistic person." Always use the person's preferred terminology.

Refer to a person™s specific disability. Avoid referring to people with disabilities as a homogeneous group where possible”the range of disabilities varies greatly, and individuals with disabilities have very different experiences depending on their condition and other factors. Furthermore, avoid using the phrase "the disabled" and exercise caution when using broad terms such as "cognitive disability" or "learning disability" when it would be more specific and appropriate to mention their exact condition. Instead, to respect a person's unique experience and needs, use words that refer to their specific condition when discussing their disability”for example, as a person with ADHD.

Respect individual preferences. Individuals have different preferences when it comes to discussing their disabilities, and some people prefer specific terms over others, such as "person of short stature" or "little person." Learn the personal preferences of those around you in order to use their preferred terms.

If you wish to contribute to our blog, please email us on morhadotsan@gmail.com.

Newyork Times Wordle

Popular Articles